<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intermittent demand classifications: is that what you need?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://openforecast.org/2024/07/16/intermittent-demand-classifications-is-that-what-you-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://openforecast.org/2024/07/16/intermittent-demand-classifications-is-that-what-you-need/</link>
	<description>How to look into the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2025 13:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ivan Svetunkov		</title>
		<link>https://openforecast.org/2024/07/16/intermittent-demand-classifications-is-that-what-you-need/#comment-209</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ivan Svetunkov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2025 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://openforecast.org/?p=3618#comment-209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://openforecast.org/2024/07/16/intermittent-demand-classifications-is-that-what-you-need/#comment-208&quot;&gt;Kishor Kukreja&lt;/a&gt;.

Sorry for not replying earlier, somehow I missed this comment.

For me, the question is what you are going to do with that afterwards? If you want to use that to choose between different forecasting techniques, maybe just a simple split to &quot;have zeroes/doesn&#039;t have&quot; would suffice. If it is just a curiosity, then who cares how you categorise the demand?

Also, have a look at this: https://openforecast.org/2025/04/11/svetunkov-sroginis-2025-model-based-demand-classification/ - I&#039;ve been working with Anna Sroginis on an alternative classification. The main idea is to first understand whether the zeroes happen naturally or artificially and then do a classification to regular/intermittent (with lumpy/smooth inside). This paper is under review right now, when it gets published, I&#039;ll write more about it (it has already changed a bit).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://openforecast.org/2024/07/16/intermittent-demand-classifications-is-that-what-you-need/#comment-208">Kishor Kukreja</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry for not replying earlier, somehow I missed this comment.</p>
<p>For me, the question is what you are going to do with that afterwards? If you want to use that to choose between different forecasting techniques, maybe just a simple split to &#8220;have zeroes/doesn&#8217;t have&#8221; would suffice. If it is just a curiosity, then who cares how you categorise the demand?</p>
<p>Also, have a look at this: <a href="https://openforecast.org/2025/04/11/svetunkov-sroginis-2025-model-based-demand-classification/" rel="ugc">https://openforecast.org/2025/04/11/svetunkov-sroginis-2025-model-based-demand-classification/</a> &#8211; I&#8217;ve been working with Anna Sroginis on an alternative classification. The main idea is to first understand whether the zeroes happen naturally or artificially and then do a classification to regular/intermittent (with lumpy/smooth inside). This paper is under review right now, when it gets published, I&#8217;ll write more about it (it has already changed a bit).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kishor Kukreja		</title>
		<link>https://openforecast.org/2024/07/16/intermittent-demand-classifications-is-that-what-you-need/#comment-208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kishor Kukreja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://openforecast.org/?p=3618#comment-208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More often I have seen the usage of ADI and CV to classify the demand type into 4 buckets.
How would you suggest one can go about understanding what the demand type of a product is ? If the goal is to only understand the type of demand for products at scale, is there a different way ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More often I have seen the usage of ADI and CV to classify the demand type into 4 buckets.<br />
How would you suggest one can go about understanding what the demand type of a product is ? If the goal is to only understand the type of demand for products at scale, is there a different way ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
