Another important Naïve method

Seasonal Naive depiction

There is another forecasting method that is extremely popular, hard to beat, and has no parameters to estimate. It also has “Naïve” in its name. Do you know what I’m talking about? It is called “Seasonal Naïve”. While the simple Naïve copies the last observed actual into the future as a forecast, the seasonal one … Read more

Why Naïve is popular and important

How Naive works

There is one forecasting method that appears more often than any other in competitions and evaluations. An experienced forecaster will always use it as a benchmark. This method is called “Naïve”, and here is why it is popular and important. Naïve is a very simple forecasting method: the forecast equals to the last observed value. … Read more

Hans Levenbach’s classification scheme for trend/seasonal components

Seasonal profile of the data

Here is a curious idea: if we can somehow estimate the importance of trend/seasonal components for your data, you can use this in model building and forecasting. But how can we do this first step? Hans Levenbach has an answer with his simple EDA technique. Let me explain. The core idea is simple and neat. … Read more

There’s no such thing as “deterministic forecast”

Sometimes I see people referring to a “deterministic” forecast, and I have some personal issues with this. Because if you apply a model to data then there is nothing deterministic about your forecasts! In many contexts, “deterministic” has a precise meaning: no randomness, no uncertainty. A deterministic solution to an optimisation problem (e.g. linear programming) … Read more

Risky business: how to select your model based on risk preferences

A distribution of some error measures across models

What do you use for model selection? Do you select the best model based on its cross-validated performance, or do you use in-sample measures like AIC? If so, there is a way to improve your selection process further. JORS recently published the paper of Nikos Kourentzes and I based on a simple but powerful idea: … Read more

Review of a paper on comparison of modern machine learning techniques in retail

A couple of days ago, I noticed a link to the following paper in a post by Jack Rodenberg: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05941v1. The topic seemed interesting and relevant to my work, so I read it, only to find that the paper contains several serious flaws that compromise its findings. Let me explain. Introduction But first, why am … Read more

SBC is not for you!

Stop using SBC!

I’ve been acting as a reviewer lately, providing comments on papers about intermittent demand, and I’ve felt a bit frustrated by what some authors write. Let me explain. Several papers I reviewed claim that demand can be either intermittent or lumpy. They then mention the Syntetos-Boylan-Croston (SBC) classification and use the thresholds from Syntetos et … Read more