So, our paper with Anna Sroginis got rejected from a special issue of the International Journal of Production Research after a second round of revision. And here is what I think about this! First things first, why am I writing this post? I want to share failures with the community, because I am tired of … Read more
I’ve been acting as a reviewer lately, providing comments on papers about intermittent demand, and I’ve felt a bit frustrated by what some authors write. Let me explain. Several papers I reviewed claim that demand can be either intermittent or lumpy. They then mention the Syntetos-Boylan-Croston (SBC) classification and use the thresholds from Syntetos et … Read more
It was a pleasure to attend the 5th IMA and OR Society Conference at Aston University, Birmingham, and to present my research with Anna Sroginis on model-based demand classification. A great crowd of people from universities across the UK, along with several esteemed international colleagues. The event was very well organised – thanks to Aris … Read more
For the last year, Anna Sroginis and I have been working on a paper, trying to modernise demand classification schemes and make them useful in the brave new era of machine learning. We have finally wrapped it up and submitted it to a peer-reviewed journal. But the temptation to share was too strong, so we … Read more
I presented our current work with Anna Sroginis during my visit of IÉSEG School of Management, Lille, France last week. It was great to see my colleague and friend Sarah Van der Auweraer, and I enjoyed the discussion we had with people in her group related to forecasting and intermittent demand. You can see details … Read more
I’m currently doing a literature review for one of my papers on intermittent demand forecasting with machine learning, and I’ve noticed a recurring fundamental mistake in several recently published papers, even in respectable peer-reviewed journals. The mistake? Using error measures based on the Mean Absolute Error (MAE). This is a crime against the humanity when … Read more
I’ve seen several times ML experts applying principles of classification for intermittent demand forecasting. For example, they try predicting, WHEN the demand will happen. This is not a very sensible thing to do. The featured image in this post shows two forecasting approaches: one that tries to predict when demand happens (the yellow line), and … Read more
While Naive is considered a standard benchmark in forecasting, there is a case where it might not be a good one: intermittent demand. And here is why I think so. Naive is a forecasting method that uses the last available observation as a forecast for the next ones. It does not have any parameters to … Read more
Anna Sroginis and I have been working on a new approach for intermittent demand classification over the past year. We’ve taken a fresh look at the problem, starting by asking: why do zeroes happen? Let’s discuss why indeed. First, a quick note: it’s a mistake to define intermittent demand simply as “demand with zeroes”. That … Read more
When you start working with your data and suddenly realise that there are zeroes there, i.e. it is intermittent demand, what should you do first? Some people use SBC classification, but is that what you need? Let’s discuss! Intermittent demand comes in different flavours: sometimes zeroes occur frequently with low demand volumes, while other times … Read more